Printable View
Dear *,
I've some issue with the naming / scale units of the network statistics of Open-E.
In my bandwith statistics I have
* title ethX bits/s
* scale maximum at 100M
That would say to me a peak in the graph of 100 MegaBIT / sec...
As I have Gigabit I assume that the title is wrong and that it should be titled with ethX BYTE/s?
Thanks,
Matthias
Can you send us a picture of that!
Also tell us what is the build of DSSv6 that you are running now ?
And what is the brand/model of eth card that you are using?
The axes are auto-scalable, they will change the maximum value according to the current transfer rates on your NIC.
I attach the images I mean.
The auto-scale you mean is what I already know, but the values seem to be strange.
You can see eth1, eth2 and eth3.
Eth1 is Gigabit Cross-Link for replication
Eth2 and Eth3 are Switch-connected Gigabit ports.
http://www.projektron.de/eth_eth1_bits_hour.png
http://www.projektron.de/eth_eth2_bits_hour.png
http://www.projektron.de/eth_eth3_bits_hour.png
But as I wrote: one possibility is that the title is "wrong" and it should be "Byte" not "Bit"?
What especially doesnt make sense to me: the "unlimited" switch-ports have less performance then the cross link connections on which we have set some limit in the replication task configuration.
Thanks,
Matthias
The build is 6.0up75.8101.5377 64bit
Are you doing MPIO across ports eth2 & eth3? If so then that would make sense that the eth1 replication link would be double the other two.
Hi webguyz,
yes we do MPIO on eth2 and 3 and the double make sense for replication, BUT:
- the initial replication is finished
- the replication link on eth1 is a GBit link...so a peak of 80 MBIT (as written in the title) is still much to little
That was the reason for my thread. Because
- if it is really BIT its just to little
- if it is BYTE its quite ok (could be better ;-) but the title is wrong...
Matthias
Anybody any experiences? Think have to open a case...;)
I've noticed the same.
Volume replication speed is real 80 MB/sec, but "statistic" shows approx. 8 times lower speed 80Mb/sec=10MB/sec.
Or maybe, because SCSI is used, there is no statistic for it. ?!?
Using the newest 6.0up90.8101.5845 64bit
and
Intel 82598EB 10-Gigabit AT2 + upd_0947-DSS-V6.upd