Search:

hi,

it seems that the missing battery buffered cache has caused the performance problems
with the replication.

we have installed several open-e SAN's base on HP Hardware (most DL 360/380...

Hi,

OPEN-E Support solved the Problem not yet. They promised me a Patch for the coming Version.

BUT - using Intel Dualhead 82571EB (rev 06) NIC for Replication works in another Configuration...

I'am in contact with OPEN-E Support. They didn't really solved the Problem yet, but one of the
OPEN-E Support Guy's improved the Performance up to 20 MB/Sec on my Lab Systems.
Probably there ist a...

Anybody using Replication with HP Hardware?

Update:

Tried Crossover Cable - Replication still extreme slow.
Changed Mirror Interface (both Sides) to old INTEL Pro 100 - Replication only 40 - 60 KB/Sec.
Build a loadbalance/rr bond with two...

Sure, Jumbo Frames are a great Feature - but definitely not indispensable for using iSCSI.
There is no Performance Issue with iSCSI. iSCSI or NAS works well - only the
Replication ist very Slow 400...

No, I am not using Jumbo Frames. In my Lab Environment there ist only one HP 2810
Switch with 2 VLAN's (one for Mgmt and iSCSI and the other one for Replication).

OPEN-E Network Test Tool shows...

Thx a lot for your Answer. But I am not sure about the meaning of your Message.
Probably my bad English.

1. Whats wrong with 90-95 MB/Sec Tranfer Speed over one Gigabit Connection?
I think 125...

Hello,

Hardware: 2 x HP DL 380 G5, 2 GB RAM, SMART 6i RAID Controller with 64 MB RAM (no Battery buffered Write Cache) 4 x 146 GB SAS 10K (Raid 5)

iSCSI/NAS Performance as expected - but...