Thanks Sh-J,
I discovered the link to the statistics with your help![]()
Thanks Sh-J,
I discovered the link to the statistics with your help![]()
A happy new year to you all!Originally Posted by Laxity
And now to something complete different...
I've run an init of a 100GB FC volume yesterday... it took only a good handful of minutes, but caused a load of 26... all FC targets for our Xen server disconnected because of time-outs. I had quite a recovery job to do, a Sunday favorite of mine :-(
(We as well had no major CPU usage, memory was mostly free (we have 4GB in the machine, running in 32 bit mode with mostly FC targets that sure is a waste of memory), our RAID peaked at 190k sectors/s writes, which seems close to the maximum to be expected) And please don't blame the disks... as the disks are always the bottleneck, it's only a question of the FC volume size to bring the system to its limits with even the fastest disks. A proper system design would limit the priority of the init job to allow the productive resources to remain usable.
This is definitely a show-stopper for proper production use, we'll have to shut down all VMs prior to creating even mid-size (100GB nd above) FC targets :-(
With regards,
Jens
If i were you, I just would not bother to use file-io volumes. Stick with block-mode and suffer the performance penalty. This was my decision because I was trying to avoid this very same issue.
It's not unusual to make adds/remove to a SAN during business hours. The action should not cause a major service interruption..