Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Hardware Recommendations?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Thank you, I will investigate the cost of this setup,

    Which SuperMicro board did you get exactly? I see there are many models, X8DT3, X8DT3-O, X8DT3-F-O, X8DT3-F???

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Also roger, I was not able to find the Adaptec 8165BR, did you mean the 5165BR? http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/support...aid/ICP5165BR/

  3. #3

    Default

    hi drew,

    you are right. i mean the 5165br and the board is the x8dt3.

  4. #4

    Question

    rogerk, what sort of performance have you been getting with larger test file sizes? Like, twice or thrice as big as your ram?

  5. #5

    Default

    1 thread writing for 20 secs to file d:\testfile.dat
    using 4KB random IOs
    enabling multiple I/Os per thread with 64 outstanding
    buffering set to use hardware disk cache (but not file cache)
    size of file d:\testfile.dat needs to be: 41943040000 bytes
    current file size: 4194304000 bytes
    need to expand by: 37748736000 bytes
    expanding d:\testfile.dat ... done.
    using specified size: 40000 MB for file: d:\testfile.dat
    initialization done
    CUMULATIVE DATA:
    throughput metrics:
    IOs/sec: 147.68
    MBs/sec: 0.57
    latency metrics:
    Min_Latency(ms): 5
    Avg_Latency(ms): 369
    Max_Latency(ms): 7260
    histogram:
    ms: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24+
    %: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100

    this was a 40GB File from our exchange 2003 on citrix xen.
    what a performance do you aspect?

    regards
    roger

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Ouch, those results seem fairly bad to me... Especially the latency.

  7. #7

    Default

    i made another test with a non production vitual machine
    testfile 40GB

    C:\Program Files (x86)\SQLIO>sqlio.exe -kW -s20 -frandom -o64 -b4 -LS -Fparam.tx
    t
    sqlio v1.5.SG
    using system counter for latency timings, 3579545 counts per second
    parameter file used: param.txt
    file g:\testfile.dat with 1 thread (0) using mask 0x0 (0)
    1 thread writing for 20 secs to file g:\testfile.dat
    using 4KB random IOs
    enabling multiple I/Os per thread with 64 outstanding
    size of file g:\testfile.dat needs to be: 41943040000 bytes
    current file size: 10485760 bytes
    need to expand by: 41932554240 bytes
    expanding g:\testfile.dat ... done.
    using specified size: 40000 MB for file: g:\testfile.dat
    initialization done
    CUMULATIVE DATA:
    throughput metrics:
    IOs/sec: 33119.70
    MBs/sec: 129.37
    latency metrics:
    Min_Latency(ms): 0
    Avg_Latency(ms): 1
    Max_Latency(ms): 403
    histogram:
    ms: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24+
    %: 84 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

    so i hope this help

    i think the test above was made on the wrong machine.
    our exchange has a 300GB database...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •