It would be awesome, if it's possible, to integrate the Adaptec Storage Manager into the DSSv6 to control the H/W Raid controllers of Adaptec by remote and with the software of Open-E.
Is there any way to do this?![]()
It would be awesome, if it's possible, to integrate the Adaptec Storage Manager into the DSSv6 to control the H/W Raid controllers of Adaptec by remote and with the software of Open-E.
Is there any way to do this?![]()
The raid card would have to have a web based admin program like areca or 3ware do. Adaptec does not have that.
Friendly log messages
Many-way, LAN/WAN replication/failover
The ability to give "friendly names" to interfaces, disk units, volumes
Network information connection specifics (link type, link speed) in the web GUI
active-active iSCSI cluster (e.g. a kind of RAID over 2 machines), storage virtualization.
regards,
Lukas
descience.NET
Dr. Lukas Pfeiffer
A-1140 Wien
Austria
www.dotnethost.at
DSS v6 b4550 iSCSI autofailover with Windows 2008 R2 failover cluster (having still some issues with autofailover).
2 DSS: 3HE Supermicro X7DBE BIOS 2.1a, Areca ARC-1261ML FW 1.48, 8x WD RE3 1TB, 1x Intel PRO1000MT Dualport, 1x Intel PRO1000PT Dualport.
2 Windows Nodes: Intel SR1500 + Intel SR1560, Dual XEON E54xx, 32 GB RAM, 6 NICs. Windows Server 2008 R2.
Apparently, the latest release candidate takes care of this on the ftp server (it's in beta, now). I haven't tried this out, but this should soon make its way to a full release, available via software update (online update).The allocation of IO resources to volume initialization is something that really needs addressed.
Active-active replication is possible, but would require something like a SAN filesystem anyway, so it wouldn't be that useful (active-active replication is available in drbd, which open-e uses) for the most part.
Another nice feature which just came out in drbd is the ability to do replication via low-latency infiniband (not just infiniband-over-ip), using the sockets direct protocol. This is really neat, and is something that other SAN providers are working on for next-gen very high performance systems. We don't have any customers that need something like this, but it would be a good way to all but completely mitigate the performance hit from replication.