Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Implications of Using Multiple LVs in iSCSI Failover Configuration

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    thanks - it was not pointed at you but for others - trust me we want this more then you can imagine and hope to have this by summer or sooner - get ready some nice surprises are coming soon - cant say but you'll see .
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    236

    Default

    I support a customer with HA setup using multiple LVs that provide a backing store for their HyperV R2 cluster. Failover times are acceptable and our last test cycles revealed no downtime during failover operation.
    As with all things, your mileage will vary, but I think you'll be ok.

  3. #3

    Default

    thanks @enealDC and @To-M.

    One more question: I've seen documentation indicating the a bonded interface will not provide for better performance with replication. I understand that a bond only multiplies bandwidth for multiple connections; does each replication task not create a new connection? Am I going to see better performance with 7x jobs across 2x Gbe or should I get 1x 10 Gbe inteface to speed this up?

    TIA
    Dave

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    236

    Default

    You'll certainly want to go with 10GBE. Don't try using multiple nics. Its just not a very scalable method IMO

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by enealDC
    You'll certainly want to go with 10GBE. Don't try using multiple nics. Its just not a very scalable method IMO
    Thanks -- I'll wait to drive a Ferrari too .... Just kidding.

    I agree with your assessment but the information I'm trying to get at is whether or not bonded NICs will increase performance at all in the case of multi-LV replication.

    Basically -- is it one job that does replication (ie, one TCP stream) or multiple jobs (ie, N TCP streams). If multiple, then we can take advantage of multiple NICs even if that's not an ideal solution. If one, then you're right that 10GbE is the only option...

    Thanks again
    Dave

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    236

    Default

    Each replication job is independent of the other, so yes, it is multiple streams.
    A dedicated 10GBE link between two DSS servers is so affordable nowadays, I can finally start recommending it. A CX4 10GB adapter will probably cost a wee bit more than say a 4 Port Copper Nic. Many Supermicro mobos have 10GBE built onto the platform. It's better for overall cable management, IRQ management and performance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •