Difference in Data Replication for WAN & LAN

[Gr-R]

Ah, yes....
forgot about the port differences in lite..
thanks To-

[prahn]

In rsync there is a compression option available ("-z" I remember), which I used for WAN replication in the past. Is this option not available in DSS?

There's some confusion now?!
Do I need to have a full paid version as a destination over WAN?
Or is the Lite version suffiecient?

[prahn]

Sorry, a small addition:
What's the difference? Just a specific port? In the Lite version the port is choosed random??

[Gr-R]

In rsync there is a compression option available ("-z" I remember), which I used for WAN replication in the past. Is this option not available in DSS?

This cannot be set from the webgui, I will see if I can get the defaults for you though.

There's some confusion now?!
Do I need to have a full paid version as a destination over WAN?

Yes

Or is the Lite version suffiecient?

Not as a destination over WAN

[prahn]

Ok, that's definetely clear now! ;-)
Would be nice to know if compression for rsync is available!
Thank you.

[Al-S]

If you mean an option to choose for compression, well this is not available yet,
but rsync has some internal mechanism for compression the data inside it.

[prahn]

Ok, but it would really be nice, if this compression option will be integrated in a future version. Should be really easy to implement!

If I make data replication via VPN to my offsite storage I do not need a specific port at all, because all ports are allowed anyway. I then do not have any difference in using the Lite version instead of using the paid version, right?