Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Poor FC performance in comparing with competitor

Thread has average rating 5.00 / 5.00 based on 1 votes.
Thread has been visited 43811 times.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #10

    Default

    Ah the world of the competitive market , looking at AVRORAID's site, I dont even see a Forum or a Blog... and when I look at there Hardware Compatibility List it is very limited where we have over 850 products that we support. I first tried to go to there support and looks limited - take a look at this link and compare. Keep in mind we are a unified file and block storage management operating system so we will have more feature sets and RAID sets as well.
    http://www.open-e.com/service-and-support/

    I would recommend to use the Full version of the DSS V6 and make sure the RAID controller has the Write Back settings enabled, also the links below.

    Read this concerning the tests we did w/ a FC Volume created on DSS V6 with FC HBA dual 4Gb and MPIO and the results where 772 MB/sec, so w/ one FC port it will be less due to the MPIO but still you should be getting better results - follow this article that will show how to setup the IOmeter.
    http://blog.open-e.com/a-few-practic...about-iometer/

    This link below might help explain the "random-vs-sequential" w/ IOmeter.
    http://blog.open-e.com/random-vs-sequential-explained/

    Learn the Write Cache settings for your controller.
    http://blog.open-e.com/just-how-impo...s-write-cache/

    If you are testing the full version send in a request at: Pre-sales (at) Open-E (dot) com and we will look at the logs but please look at the links first.
    Last edited by Al-S; 03-07-2012 at 02:35 PM.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •