Visit Open-E website
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 'No space left on device' inode problem?

  1. #1

    Default 'No space left on device' inode problem?

    Two identical DSS 6 systems here:

    Model: Data Storage Software V6
    Version: 6.0up97.8101.6325 64bit
    Release date: 2012-06-15
    Licensed Storage Capacity: unlimited

    The first system provides a client-accessible NFS mount; the second system is used as an offsite mirror of the first, not directly accessible to clients.

    On each system, we recently added a RAID volume and used it to increase the size of the logical volume. ‘df’ shows an abundance of space available for use:

    # df -h /mnt/tmp/
    Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
    gverc:/GCC_archive 107T 29T 79T 27% /mnt/tmp

    However, on the first system, we found that NFS clients were getting errors like this:

    # mkdir /mnt/tmp/zzztestzzz
    mkdir: cannot create directory `/mnt/tmp/zzztestzzz': No space left on device

    I assume it’s an inode issue, because when you remove a number of file/directory objects, the same number of objects can subsequently be created successfully.

    I found this KB article ...

    http://kb.open-e.com/Expanding-full-...o-it_1063.html

    ... and tried the suggested solution, but it didn’t work. Or maybe I didn’t do it right.

    What should be done to solve this problem? And why might it affect just one of our systems?

  2. #2

    Default

    You might want to update to the latest version of the DSS V6 w/ build 7337 and perform a Repair Filesystem after as there could have been something that might happened after the increase of the volume re-sizing. It could also be something else but we would need to see the log file from that system and you can submit a support ticket and we can review them.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    935

    Default

    You need to apply a small update to mount the shares with inode64.
    Please also note you must set FSID manually for each share (in webGUI).
    See your inbox for update.

  4. #4

    Default

    thanks for the replies, but now I'm confused about how to proceed. Should I submit a support ticket or apply the update? If the latter, how do I apply the update, exactly, and is there any danger of data loss? Sorry to admit that I have very limited experience with these systems.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    935

    Default

    you may upload the update in the webGUI at MAINTENANCE-->Software updates. Reboot for it to be applied.
    After reboot the system will mount with inode64. You will also need to go to each share and set the FSID for NFS. This is a number, and unique to each share.
    If this solves your problem, great. If not, you may open a support ticket.
    Also be aware that changing to inode64 it is recommended to stay with it. If in the future if you remove the small update some data may become inaccessible.

  6. #6

    Default

    okay, thanks. That sounds fairly straightforward, with the exception of setting the FSID. Where/how is that done?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    935

    Default

    It is set in the webGUI, CONFIGURATION-->NAS RESOURCES, shares. Select the share and you will see a box to enter the ID.

  8. #8

    Default

    that's what I assumed, but I can't locate such a box. Would it only be available/visible after the update is applied?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    935

    Default

    you will not see it until the update is applied and the server rebooted.

  10. #10

    Default

    after successfully applying the update and setting FSIDs for the two shares on the system (FSID 1 and FSID 2, respectively), I remounted the share in question and found that I still get the "No space left on device" error. Did I miss something? Should I try updating the the latest version of DSS 6 followed by a filesystem repair as suggested by Todd? Or ... ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •