Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Bad performance with BlockIO

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    O.K.

    I used the DSS Demo CD and the performance is the same. Sequential read with one worker is fast and with two workers the value goes down after a few seconds.

    Best regards
    Stefan

  2. #2

    Default

    I have asked engineers to review this issue - they may need logs from the DSS using your ticket # from last communications.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  3. #3

    Default

    FYI: Engineers have confirmed that fileIO can by much faster in random access.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    OK, so in my Enviroment there is in the current version FileIO the better choice.

    Will there be changes in the future that more cache will be used in BlockIO? (When i'm right that the cachig in FileIO results the more performance in random IO.)

    Best regards

    Stefan

  5. #5

    Default

    Our Research department will review this but they will need to time to schedule testing.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Hi Todd,

    did you hear something?

    Regards
    Stefan

  7. #7

    Default

    This is going to take time for them to work on this as there are many projects in front that they have to complete first. Nothing I can do now.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •