Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: some general questions..

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    Hi everybody..

    @Raudi: my question pointed to your issue :-) i think we will test some scenarios with block and with file IO

    @netsyphon: yes, whoah :-) we decided to use as many spindles as we can due to high IO requirements. we discussed rebuilding times and we decided that a rebuild up to 30h is OK. right now we have a 12 disk 5 TB raid6 on a slower controller and it takes up to 10h for a complete rebuild with normal workload.

    if this big block is going to be critical we can run all our VMs on an alternative iscsi path with our secondary dss which has replicated volumes from out primary dss

    if anything else is going wrong we have an additional backup server with snapshots of all VMs , so data-loss shouldn't be any problem

    our vms are mostly development systems, so downtime is not really critical for us.

    @shon: we will do some tests with 2x quadcore vs. 2x dualcore xeons, i think its interesting which kind of processor does more IO in multithreaded applications like ESX farming

    thanks for the moment.

    regards, lutz

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    I think the bottleneck woll be the harddrives not the CPU...

    A few days ago i made a migration of 6x 750GB to 8x 750GB and this takes nearly one week to rebuild. Perhaps a rebuild after a drive failure is faster than a migration... Until now i didn't had a drive failure.

    Best regards
    Stefan

  3. #3

    Default

    Hi Raudi,

    what kind of controller do you use?
    we had similar problems with 3ware products (eg 9550), on high IO situation the r/w performance dropped down to constant 8MB/s for minutes, then rising again for some time, again dropping...

    so we switched from 3ware with raid5 to areca raid6 and we noticed a massive perfromance gain compared to 3ware, even with raid6!

    regards,

    lutz

  4. #4

    Default

    Found others having issues with performance on the 3Ware 9550 as well, not sure if this will help in your incase but others claimed it did when they updated to latest.

    http://www.3ware.com/KB/article.aspx?id=14956
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  5. #5

    Default

    Hi Todd,

    thanks for that interesting info. a little bit too late for us, we switched to areca mid 2006 :-)

    Regards,
    Lutz

  6. #6

    Default

    Hi warmduscher,

    Please update us when you run tests with 2x quadcore vs. 2x dualcore xeons. Lets us know

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by warmduscher
    what kind of controller do you use?
    we had similar problems with 3ware products (eg 9550), on high IO situation the r/w performance dropped down to constant 8MB/s for minutes, then rising again for some time, again dropping...
    I use a 3ware 9550SXU-16ML... This sounds not good, but i hope the issue is fixed. Uses here someone a 3ware too and can tell his experience?

    Regards
    Stefan

  8. #8

    Default

    We used a 3ware 95xx series card (first half of 2007), and we had horrible performance. We also switched to an Areca controller.

  9. #9

    Default

    we use 9650 controllers and have no problems.

    if i could go back however i would have bought Arcea.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •