Visit Open-E website
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Wrong download link?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Cool Wrong download link?

    I'm little bit confused here, but am I the only one who is getting the old 6.0up90 5845 instead of the latest 6.0up95 b6156 by following the download links? Sure, I can use the ftp server directly but ...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    935

    Default

    b_6156 has been temporarily removed from the downloads. It will be back soon.
    Currently, b_5845 should be used.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gr-R View Post
    b_6156 has been temporarily removed from the downloads. It will be back soon.
    Currently, b_5845 should be used.
    Thanks for your answer but is there a blog post or news entry or something which is telling me why?

  4. #4

    Default

    We wanted to modify some more improvements and it should be out by end of next week.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Ok now thats getting more suspicious and confusing. Wouldn't that normally be a simple update? Instead of blocking silently an already announced version?

  6. #6

    Default

    Nick,

    We have done this in the past and the version is still good and is very similar to the 5845, like I said the enhanced version will be out next week.
    All the best,

    Todd Maxwell


    Follow the red "E"
    Facebook | Twitter | YouTube

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    8

    Default

    You should correct the link to the release notes. It shows the up95 b6156 version instead of up90 b5845.

    For me it dosen't matter when what version will be or not released, I don't care. I'm just wondering about your release and information practice which I've to explain to my team leader while he is asking me why I didn't do the scheduled update. That's all.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    142

    Default

    What if we already have installed 6156?

    6.0up95.8101.6156 64bit

    Is this going to be a problem?
    Last edited by webguyz; 05-22-2012 at 12:01 AM. Reason: spelling

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    54

    Default

    If you are using b6156 and it's working properly for you, then it's to keep it running.
    We discovered some storage availability issues in ESX when updating from older DSS V6 versions.
    If you have used an older DSS V6 version and after the update to b6156 you are facing some problems, you should downgrade to the older version to fix it.
    If you made a clean install of the DSS V6 b6156 and you are facing any problems with storage availability in ESX downgrading to the older version won't help.

    BR,
    Tomek

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    142

    Default

    So no worries as long as we are not use ESX. Good to know. Thanks!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •