Visit Open-E website
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Poor FC performance in comparing with competitor

Thread has average rating 5.00 / 5.00 based on 1 votes.
Thread has been visited 47372 times.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default

    We installed trial version of DSS 6.0 and get additional information concerning IOMeter options from AVRORAID. They got test using file pattern with block size 1 Mb (100%). We used the same pattern and repeat test. The result is better, but still is worse than AVRORAID 280 MB/s. Specialists from AVRORAID believe, that Open-E can't work properly (with high performance) with large block size (1MB).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlib View Post
    ...Specialists from AVRORAID believe, that Open-E can't work properly (with high performance) with large block size (1MB).
    It is not surprising for a vendor to try to dismiss another vendor's products.

    One thing to consider... does the AvroRAID product support the same feature set as Open-e? Volume Snapshots?

    Don't get me wrong, I think that AvroRAID has some potential (I had a look for myself, too bad they don't have a North American base/var network). I just want to make sure that you realize what the trade-offs (every solution has them) are between the 2 solutions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •