b_6156 has been temporarily removed from the downloads. It will be back soon.
Currently, b_5845 should be used.
b_6156 has been temporarily removed from the downloads. It will be back soon.
Currently, b_5845 should be used.
Ok now thats getting more suspicious and confusing. Wouldn't that normally be a simple update? Instead of blocking silently an already announced version?
You should correct the link to the release notes. It shows the up95 b6156 version instead of up90 b5845.
For me it dosen't matter when what version will be or not released, I don't care. I'm just wondering about your release and information practice which I've to explain to my team leader while he is asking me why I didn't do the scheduled update. That's all.
What if we already have installed 6156?
6.0up95.8101.6156 64bit
Is this going to be a problem?
Last edited by webguyz; 05-22-2012 at 12:01 AM. Reason: spelling
In future, I would suggest that a more "direct" answer would be appropriate.
By "direct answer" I mean:
"We discovered some issues in ESX functionality when updating from older DSS V6 versions, so we have withdrawn the upgrade."
Anything else can be seen as been deceptive.
To be even more pro-active a message should have been posted to this forum advising users of the issues. ESX systems are core to many organizations, to not be advised of potential issues before the update is applied is not good.
Not impressed either. I had downloaded 6.0up95 a few weeks ago, but hadn't got around to restarting. Could have been nasty - you could have mentioned something.
BTW - Did a restart tonight and found that my network ports on a NextGen card were missing. Without further ado went backto up80. That's when I found this.
Any other issues we should know about?
We already released the RC build of up97. and that should help to solve your issues .